|
Please
forward this message to friends and colleagues whom you believe
would be interested in it. Click on the link in the left column
for a form on which you can quickly and easily add their email address.
Are
We Programmed for Political Polarization?
July, 2005
By Donna Zajonc ©2005
Americans
are asking "How did we become so politically polarized? Are politicians
programmed to always fight?"
In
a recent study now known as the "hot sauce study" psychologists
got an insight into how far people would go to hurt others who think
differently from themselves. It gives us a glimpse of why some groups
are perpetuating this era of political polarization.
Psychologist
Tom Pyszczynski, from the University of Colorado, devised a 1998
study of American college students that measured their reaction
when they were reminded of their own death. The team of psychologists
tested the relationship between the student's awareness of their
own mortality and the degree to which they became hostile toward
others who appear to have different world views.
The
study included one group of college Republicans and another group
of college Democrats. Republican students were responsible for dishing
out "blazingly hot, hot sauce" to the Democrats and vice versa.
Just
before giving out the hot sauce, one group of students were asked
to read an essay reminding them of the inevitability of their death.
The other group of students did not read the essay and were not
reminded of their death before administrating the hot sauce.
The
results were dramatic. Students who had not been reminded of their
own death before they had to make a decision, doled out an average
of 11.86 grams of hot sauce to their political opponents. Those
who were required to read the death essay and were reminded of their
own mortality loaded their political opponents with a huge dose
of 26.31 grams of sauce!
This
"hot sauce study," along with over 250 studies from various other
research teams have tested the relationship between our cognitive
choices and hostility toward those who have different world views.
Together the collective studies have helped Pyszczynski and his
team devise what is now known as the Terrorist Management Theory.
After
9/11, Americans suddenly became aware of the random acts of violence
facing our nation. We are vividly reminded of death everyday as
we view the nightly news and hear the latest casualty figures from
all around the globe.
These
studies demonstrate that, when the possibility of death is within
our awareness, we may become aggressive - even abusive - towards
those who see life differently than we do.
Just
as the political parties and elected elite believe they will face
political death (aka lose the next election) they have chosen to
go the path of partisan warfare believing it will ensure political
survival while the rest of us watch in a state of political depression.
Could
it be that some political strategists and partisan power brokers
choose to keep death and fear in the forefront of our national conversation
in order to dole out an extra helping of hot sauce to their political
foes? Are certain media giants using these same tactics to keep
their loyal audience?
The
dilemma is that terrorist acts and violence are real and remind
us of our death everyday. The Republican Party chose this as their
primary theme during the past election cycle.
The
Democrats tend to speak of death in terms of global warming and
environmental destruction, which reminds us that our survival and
the earth's survival may be in doubt. When both parties focus on
fear and annihilation, our citizens are kept in a state of national
alarm and heightened anxiety.
Keeping
the politics of death and destruction in the forefront of our national
political debate is at the root of our political polarization---each
party fighting for their own survival while foisting a shadow of
fear and hopelessness upon Americans.
What
is even more destructive is how interests groups have adopted these
tactics, as though they are learned psychologists pulling the strings
of citizen puppets. It is no wonder that the average citizen now
feels the sickly affects of the political polarization put forth
by the parties.
Political
strategists are earning their big bucks by applying these psychological
insights to their politically spun messages in order to motivate
their constituencies. Is this the reason why our political conversation
is dominated by hot sauce being thrown around as though we live
in an elementary school cafeteria?
It is the political and media elite who are intentionally programming
the national debate that causes fellow American's to demonize those
who do not agree with them. Rather than "United We Stand" some are
taking delight in "Divided We Fall" tactics.
It
is no surprise that so many citizens have disengaged from politics
and become political depressed. We are protecting our psyche, hoping
and praying for new elected and party leaders who understand our
current culture of hot sauce politics and choose not to engage in
the food fight.
We
do not have to stay stuck in the polarizing politics that our parties
and media are dishing out. There is scientific research that gives
us hope for survival!
My
next newsletter will focus on the new studies that demonstrate we
are hard-- wired to survive through compassion, collaboration and
love rather than demonizing and killing one another. Most Americans
know that we have a greater chance of survival and success, both
individually and collectively if we figure out how to work together
instead of against one another.
Stay
tuned!
Schedule
Donna as Your Keynote Speaker
I
am now scheduling keynote speeches. If you belong to an organization,
church, or community gathering where I might present The Politics
of Hope ideas, please contact
me for speaking opportunities.
Donna
Zajonc
is a Political Leadership Coach, a former three-term Oregon Legislator
and was her party's nominee for Secretary of State. She has also
managed several campaigns including a highly visible governor's
campaign. Donna challenges her clients to prepare for public office
with the same rigor that all professionals seek.
|